I have never thought about how
other websites are laid out or utilized until this class and I started looking
at things a little differently. One of the tools that I have learned in many
of my business classes was about the layout planning K.I.S.S {Keep It Simple
Stupid}…. Ok.. maybe the last “S” is wrong but that’s how I remember it.
These are my personal opinions about other websites and how they don’t exactly follow those guidelines. There is no right or wrong way to create websites, but there are tools that will make it more attractive to the target market being reached.
- Tectorch: http://tectorch.com/
Ø It was a little hard to read at first due to the small type. Possible Solution: enlarge the font
size, keep it simple on the home page
Ø It needs to be organized better. Possible Solution: have tabs at the top/ side for the
different categories rather than all listed products listed
Ø Contact information hard to find. Possible Solution: should be at the top and easy to
access instead of buried at the bottom. It also should be accessible from each page
Ø The testimonials and fact sheets should nave own tabs and also be in a PDF /printable
form. Possible Solution: make these options their own tabs/links to that
information.
Ø To me this was more of a blog rather than a company’s website.
Ø A little confusing on what it was supposed to be about
Ø It looked like it had a theme “pemaculture” but doesn’t really say what that is. Possible
Solution: have an intro section.
Ø Quite a few times in the blog.. writer states “I’ll say it later” or “that’s another story”… but
doesn’t link to that other story. Possible Solution: Insert links to those later
discussions or create an archive sections
Ø Other thing was the links /ads on the top & bottom about free music (and other ads that
changed) was distracting and had nothing to do with the site. They were large
and seemed part of the blog. Possible Solution: Remove those ads or make them
smaller and at the bottom only. Make those ads different colors and sizes to show
that they are different from the main site.
Ø There was not a link to find out about the author… only a spot to link the blog on other
social media sites. Possible Solution: add an "about me/us” tab/link/ bio page.
And here are the sites that I think did pretty well. Of course
they were up next to much stiffer competition with Apple, Toyota & Ford. Both
of these sites were pleasing to my eyes and I was able to play around on their
sites with ease.
Ø The sliding pages were an easy way to get to what the customer is looking for.
Ø There is a section to bookmark or share the website on other social media sites
Ø Easy to use tabs (top & bottom); shopping cart; language tab & location finder
Ø The choice of colors was pleasing, with the logo clearly in the left corner.
Ø On the 1st page is a brief synopsis of who & what the company is about. It proudly states
that they are a private US company even though they have service centers in
other countries.
- GForce race cars: http://www.gforceracecars.com/
Ø Tabs on the site were easy to use and understand
Ø Regardless of the page a customer might be on – the tabs and headers remained the same
to navigate back and forth
Ø Contact us page even had a map
Ø Only drawback (in my humble opinion)…was that I thought it was a race care site… not a
parts site. And the flashing logo “Featured product”… is annoying since there
is no product listed or linked.
I too, am from the era, when the catch phrase was the K.I.S.S. method. Keep it simple, stupid. I studied advertising and marketing eons a go. I know I’m dating myself. Modern marketing philosophy has come a long way. Marketing efforts today must be much more sophisticated, due to information available today on the Internet. However, I think there is still a need to keep things simple, in this complex world.
ReplyDeleteI agreed with you on most of you comments regarding the websites. My worst pick for website was http://www.richsoil.com/raising-chickens.jsp. I think it failed 7 out of the 8 principles in a well C.R.A.P.H.T.E.D. site. The aesthetics are pretty atrocious. The site is poorly designed and lacks effective branding principles. I gave it an A for making me laugh. It was so absurd, and bazar. It failed miserably in the litmus test as far a website goes.
Hi Sharin,
ReplyDeleteI hope you will not be offended if I offer up a design suggestion for your blog, since that is what we are looking at this week. I find your blog to be a bit hard to read, due to the design. There is small white text scrolling over a busy image. Sometimes the blue text for the links is very hard to read.
I think scrolling text over an image like you are doing is the most challenging as far as creating something easy to read for your visitors.
I think you have a really, really good layout of your text and points, and if it was all just a little larger and bolder it would be easier to read.